The purpose of this discussion is for you to search for qualitative evidence that contributes to practice change and improvement of a National Practice Problem. You will be proficient in research critique when using the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool. You will gain experience in judging qualitative research for applicability to the practice problem. The critique of research focuses on potential solutions and interventions to improve outcomes.
Instructions
Conduct a search of the Chamberlain library to find a single source of qualitative research on the National Practice Problem selected in Week 3. Be sure to use the most recent evidence available (within the past 5 years).
The qualitative source of evidence you select must be a single source of evidence. Systematic reviews are not permitted for this assignment.
Present the written reference and permalink for the article selected.
Summarize the article to include the method, design, aim/purpose, sample size and sample type, key findings/results, level, and quality grade.
Describe the value of the qualitative research findings related to the National Practice Problem.
Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool to the discussion.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve healthcare. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes healthcare policies to advocate for equitable healthcare and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Critically appraise literature for level and quality of evidence to support practice change. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7)
Appraise global healthcare practice problems and DNP practice relevant to advanced nursing practice. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 9)
Welcome to our Week 4 Discussion! We encourage you to read the question carefully to answer all aspects presented. Our interactive discussion addresses the following course outcomes:
CO2. Critically appraise literature for level and quality of evidence to support practice change. (POs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7)
CO3. Appraise global healthcare practice problems and DNP practice relevant to advanced nursing practice. (POs 1, 3, 9)
Please continue to use your writing resources as you construct your posts such as Grammarly, Chamberlain Guidelines for Professional Writing, and Turnitin Draft Box.