In Thing v. La Chusa, review the Court’s ruling concerning Maria right to recove

WRITE MY ESSAY

In Thing v. La Chusa, review the Court’s ruling concerning Maria right to recovery for emotional distress. Do you think the general legal opinion that emotional or mental distress will not suffice as an injury for purposes of pleading a prima facie case for negligence is fair? Explain why or why not. If a physical injury must accompany emotional distress, how significant must that injury be. Imagine you are writing an amicus curiae brief to the judge regarding the Thing case. Explain in that brief, an alternative legal framework that you think would be more fair to the plaintiff.

WRITE MY ESSAY

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top